Hutchison Drei (Three) Austria: Enterprise Infrastructure Transparency

Establishing Enterprise Transparency, Accountability, and Operational Resilience at Scale

Executive Impact.

▪

Enterprise infrastructure environment covering 2,500+ servers

▪

Enterprise-wide automation strategy implemented

▪

End-to-end patch management redesigned

▪

Infrastructure discovery automated through BMC Discovery

▪

Enterprise automation established using LEON by automate-it.cc

▪

Security and vulnerability management embedded into operational processes

▪

Hundreds of business and technology stakeholders affected

▪

Multiple mandate extensions across more than eight years

Outcome.

▪

More than 2,500 servers governed through automated processes

▪

Enterprise-scale infrastructure transparency established

▪

Patch management moved from periodic projects to continuous operations

▪

Manual planning and coordination effort materially reduced

▪

Compliance, security, and operational resilience strengthened

▪

Real-time visibility into infrastructure health and vulnerabilities established

▪

Accountability linked more closely to service ownership

▪

Sustainable operating capability established across business and IT

Executive Summary.

A large-scale infrastructure environment relied on highly manual maintenance processes involving hundreds of participants, fragmented ownership, and limited operational transparency.

Executive leadership redesigned governance, automated critical processes, and established an operating model capable of managing patching, vulnerability exposure, and infrastructure status at scale.

The initiative changed both the technical process and the organizational understanding of ownership and operational responsibility.

Situation.

▪

More than 2,500 enterprise servers

▪

CMDB maintained manually and frequently outdated

▪

Large-scale patch cycles conducted only several times per year

▪

Hundreds of business and IT stakeholders involved

▪

Significant coordination effort required for each cycle

▪

Limited transparency regarding infrastructure status

▪

Growing vulnerability exposure and operational risk

Situation.

▼

Situation.

▪

More than 2,500 enterprise servers

▪

CMDB maintained manually and frequently outdated

▪

Large-scale patch cycles conducted only several times per year

▪

Hundreds of business and IT stakeholders involved

▪

Significant coordination effort required for each cycle

▪

Limited transparency regarding infrastructure status

▪

Growing vulnerability exposure and operational risk

Challenge.

The technology required for automation was available. The more difficult issue was organizational.

Greater transparency made ownership, status, vulnerabilities, and decision responsibilities visible across hundreds of stakeholders. Automation therefore required changes to long-established behaviors, roles, and accountability models.

Some stakeholders initially viewed transparency as a threat because it made unresolved responsibility harder to avoid.

Challenge.

▼

Challenge.

The technology required for automation was available. The more difficult issue was organizational.

Greater transparency made ownership, status, vulnerabilities, and decision responsibilities visible across hundreds of stakeholders. Automation therefore required changes to long-established behaviors, roles, and accountability models.

Some stakeholders initially viewed transparency as a threat because it made unresolved responsibility harder to avoid.

Leadership Contribution.

▪

Designed the transformation strategy for infrastructure governance

▪

Introduced automated infrastructure discovery through BMC Discovery

▪

Implemented enterprise automation capabilities using LEON

▪

Replaced manual patch cycles with continuous end-to-end operating processes

▪

Introduced self-service planning for business stakeholders

▪

Linked accountability more closely to service ownership

▪

Built organizational support through proof-of-concept-driven engagement

▪

Aligned infrastructure, security, operations, and executive leadership

▪

Embedded vulnerability management into operational governance

▪

Established executive reporting for infrastructure health and risk

▪

Converted periodic maintenance activity into a continuously managed operating capability

Key Takeaway.

Operational resilience improves when transparency, accountability, and automation become part of the operating model.

The program created a sustained enterprise capability rather than another isolated technology process.

Automation created resilience because transparency, accountability, and operational responsibility became part of the operating model.

© 2026 E-CON

Enterprise Transformation Executive focused on aligning business, technology, governance, and execution.
Based in Vienna, Austria - engaged across European and international transformation environments.

© 2026 E-CON

Enterprise Transformation Executive focused on aligning business, technology, governance, and execution.
Based in Vienna, Austria - engaged across European and international transformation environments.

© 2026 E-CON

Enterprise Transformation Executive focused on aligning business, technology, governance, and execution.
Based in Vienna, Austria - engaged across European and international transformation environments.